<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Missourians for Safe Energy (MSE)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mosafeenergy.org/current/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mosafeenergy.org/current</link>
	<description>Safe, Sustainable and Nuclear-Free Energy for Missouri</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:07:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>MSE Joins Allies in Opposing Ameren&#8217;s Bid to Zero Out Efficiency Programs</title>
		<link>http://mosafeenergy.org/current/2011/11/mse-joins-allies-in-opposing-amerens-bid-to-zero-out-efficiency-programs/</link>
		<comments>http://mosafeenergy.org/current/2011/11/mse-joins-allies-in-opposing-amerens-bid-to-zero-out-efficiency-programs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues We Oppose]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mosafeenergy.org/current/?p=603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Missourians for Safe Energy has join our allies, the Missouri Coalition for the Environment, Sierra Club, the Natural Resources Defense Council and Renew Missouri in opposing, before the Public Service Commission, Ameren&#8217;s effort to amend its Integrated Resource Plan to eliminate funding for energy efficiency programs.  See news release from Great Rivers Environmental Law Center [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Missourians for Safe Energy has join our allies, the Missouri Coalition for the Environment, Sierra Club, the Natural Resources Defense Council <a href="http://mosafeenergy.org/current/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/MO-PSC.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-606" title="MO PSC" src="http://mosafeenergy.org/current/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/MO-PSC.jpg" alt="" width="78" height="78" /></a>and Renew Missouri in opposing, before the Public Service Commission, Ameren&#8217;s effort to amend its Integrated Resource Plan to eliminate funding for energy efficiency programs.  See news release from Great Rivers Environmental Law Center <a title="News Release regarding intervention in Ameren IRP" href="http://mosafeenergy.org/current/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/PressRelease1129111.pdf" target="_blank">HERE</a>.</p>
<p>Efficiency investments are the most cost effective and Ameren&#8217;s own studies showed that with modest efficiency investments there would be no need for any new power plants for the next two decades.  Ameren has even stated that, with their previously planned efficiency investments, they could shut down an existing dirty coal plant and have sufficient generating capacity. Details on this <a title="Ameren Admits" href="http://mosafeenergy.org/current/2011/03/ameren-exec-we-really-dont-need-any-new-plants/" target="_blank">HERE</a>.</p>
<p>This would be significantly cheaper for customers, but less profitable to Ameren. As a regulated public monopoly, however, Ameren should be required to operate in the public interest, not the interest of their stockholders.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mosafeenergy.org/current/2011/11/mse-joins-allies-in-opposing-amerens-bid-to-zero-out-efficiency-programs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Action Alert: Mini-CWIP May Resurface in Special Session</title>
		<link>http://mosafeenergy.org/current/2011/07/action-alert-mini-cwip-may-resurface-in-special-session/</link>
		<comments>http://mosafeenergy.org/current/2011/07/action-alert-mini-cwip-may-resurface-in-special-session/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 03:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues We Oppose]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mosafeenergy.org/current/?p=589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As reported in the Missouri News Horizon, Governor Jay Nixon is planning on calling the General Assembly back for a special session, possibly very soon, and one of the bills that may be considered is Ameren Mini-CWIP proposal, that would allow the utility to charge customers in advance for the costs of obtaining an Early [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As reported in the <a title="Special Session" href="http://missouri-news.org/featured/nuclear-power-bill-could-see-new-life-in-special-session/6643" target="_blank"><em>Missouri News Horizon</em></a>, Governor Jay Nixon is planning on calling the General Assembly back for a special session, possibly very soon, and one of the bills that may be considered is Ameren Mini-CWIP proposal, that would allow the utility to charge customers in advance for the costs of obtaining an Early Site Permit for a new reactor at Ameren&#8217;s Callaway County site. To read more about the unfolding politics please  <a title="Special Session" href="http://missouri-news.org/featured/nuclear-power-bill-could-see-new-life-in-special-session/6643" target="_blank"><strong>CLICK HERE</strong></a>.</p>
<p>This would be a very good  time to let Governor Nixon know that there is significant opposition to  this being included in a special session. You can do this at any time by clicking here for <strong><a title="The Governor" href="http://governor.mo.gov/contact/ " target="_blank">Governor Nixon&#8217;s Website</a></strong> &amp;/or by calling (573) 751-3222 during business hours.</p>
<p>Please join us in taking action now. Below, please find a sample note that MSE Chair Mark Haim posted on Governor Nixon&#8217;s site. Your note need not be this long, but please post something. Thank you.</p>
<p>==================================</p>
<p>Dear Governor Nixon,</p>
<p>I sincerely hope you  will think long and hard before including the so-called &#8220;mini-CWIP&#8221; bill  in the charge for a special session of the General</p>
<div id="attachment_594" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://mosafeenergy.org/current/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Callaway-11.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-594" title="Callaway 1" src="http://mosafeenergy.org/current/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Callaway-11.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Ameren&#39;s Callaway 1 Nuclear Plant near Fulton, Missouri</p></div>
<p>Assembly.</p>
<p>The  legislation, even in its supposed &#8220;compromise&#8221; form is seriously  flawed. If passed, it would establish the precedent of transferring risk  from investors to ratepayers for a new nuclear plant. New nuclear  projects have been consistently rejected as too risky to touch by the  investment community, and thus are only being pursued if the risks are  transferred to the taxpayers, through loan guarantees, or the  ratepayers, through CWIP.</p>
<p>If this bill is passed, it would allow  Ameren to do something they are thoroughly capable of doing on their  own, spend $45 million to pursue an early site permit for a new Callaway  nuclear unit, and then recover this from ratepayers. In fact, they have  already spent $25 million of this money. The Early Site Permit costs  far less than 1% of what it would ultimately cost to build a new nuclear  unit (likely in the range of $10 billion).</p>
<p>The real value to  Ameren is that this bill would provide a foot-in-the-door, so that, when  they were ready to actually build a new plant, they could come back to  the legislature with a bill similar to their 2009 proposed full repeal  of the ban on CWIP. They could then say something to the effect of &#8220;you  authorized us to spend $45 million of the ratepayers money, and now, to  move this forward, and not have that money wasted, we need CWIP to build  the plant.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is clearly an anti-consumer bill and must not  be passed. Particularly in the wake of the Fukushima disaster, when the  whole world is reconsidering the acceptability of nuclear energy, it  would be very foolish to allow ratepayer funds to be sunk into a very  expensive, very risky, dead-end technology.</p>
<p>I strongly urge you  to keep any CWIP legislation off the table.</p>
<p>Thank you for  considering my perspective. I look forward to hearing back from you.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Mark  Haim</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mosafeenergy.org/current/2011/07/action-alert-mini-cwip-may-resurface-in-special-session/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mini-CWIP Dies at End of Session</title>
		<link>http://mosafeenergy.org/current/2011/05/mini-cwip-dies-at-end-of-session/</link>
		<comments>http://mosafeenergy.org/current/2011/05/mini-cwip-dies-at-end-of-session/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 03:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues We Oppose]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mosafeenergy.org/current/?p=574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very good news tonight from MSE&#8217;s perspective. The proposed mini-CWIP legislation that would have allowed Ameren to charge ratepayers for the cost of an Early Site Permit for a new nuclear power plant in Callaway County, years before it was built and operating, died due to lack of time at the close of the legislative [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Very good news tonight from MSE&#8217;s perspective. The proposed mini-CWIP legislation</strong> that would have allowed Ameren to charge ratepayers for the cost of an Early Site Permit for a new nuclear power plant in Callaway County, years before it was built and operating, <strong>died due to lack of time at the close of the legislative session. </strong></p>
<p>While we are very pleased that Ameren has been denied an nuclear foot-in-the-door, at least for now, we have a lot of work to do to educate the <a href="http://mosafeenergy.org/current/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/callaway-1-and-22.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-579" title="callaway 1 and 2" src="http://mosafeenergy.org/current/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/callaway-1-and-22.jpg" alt="" width="570" height="312" /></a>public and our elected officials as to what constitutes a safe, sustainable and affordable energy strategy. We invite your participation in this effort. Please contact us if you&#8217;d like to help.</p>
<p>For more details from the <em>St. Louis Post-Dispatch</em> on the way a supposed compromise between the industrial customers and the utilities died please <strong><a title="P-D Story" href="http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/political-fix/article_e083738a-7dc0-11e0-a3e5-001a4bcf6878.html" target="_blank">CLICK HERE</a></strong>.</p>
<p>Also check out the coverage given in the <em>St. Louis Business Journal</em>, which can be read if you<strong> <a title="StL Biz Jrl" href="http://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/news/2011/05/13/ameren-nuclear-bill-fails-to-pass.html" target="_blank">CLICK HERE</a></strong>.</p>
<p>Both these reports largely give the pro-nuke voices a pass by avoiding any  critical questioning of their claims. For example, the Business Journal just reports, but never questions the Energy Alliance claim that min-CWIP would &#8220;create jobs,  boost our economy and competitiveness, and keep rates affordable&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>In general, the media fails to question the notion that  mini-CWIP is needed to keep &#8220;new nuclear power as an option.&#8221; As we&#8217;ve repeatedly pointed out, Ameren can  pursue an early site permit with or without mini-CWIP. The $45 million the ESP would cost is within their abilities and they&#8217;ve actually already spent more than half of it. What they can&#8217;t do is  get financing to build a new plant without full CWIP, which, of course wasn&#8217;t  what they were asking for; at least not this year.</p>
<p>Another big  failure in media coverage is the lack of questioning of the pro-nukers  continual conflation of the supposed benefits of building a new  nuke&#8211;years down the pike, if ever&#8211;and the passage of mini-CWIP, which  would primarily reimburse Ameren for money already spent, which does  nothing for jobs, boosting the economy, etc.</p>
<p><strong>So, we need to educate the public, our elected officials <span style="text-decoration: underline;">AND the MEDIA</span></strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mosafeenergy.org/current/2011/05/mini-cwip-dies-at-end-of-session/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ramming through pro-nuclear legislation not an energy solution for Missouri</title>
		<link>http://mosafeenergy.org/current/2011/05/ramming-through-pro-nuclear-legislation-not-an-energy-solution-for-missouri/</link>
		<comments>http://mosafeenergy.org/current/2011/05/ramming-through-pro-nuclear-legislation-not-an-energy-solution-for-missouri/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 02:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issues We Oppose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues We Support]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mosafeenergy.org/current/?p=569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is a letter to the editor of the Columbia Missourian by MSE member Jean Blackwood, published on May 3, 2011: Dear Editor, Although we have seen the defeat of a bill to partially repeal construction work in progress and head our state down the road to more dangerous, expensive nuclear power, there are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following is a letter to the editor of the <em>Columbia Missourian</em> by MSE member Jean Blackwood, published on May 3, 2011:</p>
<p>Dear Editor,</p>
<p>Although we have seen the defeat of a bill to partially repeal  construction work in progress and head our state down the road to more  dangerous, expensive nuclear power, there are powerful voices and lots  of money still trying to get a bill through our legislature before the  session ends.  One of Columbia&#8217;s representatives, Chris Kelly, is so  intent on this that he wants a special session called just to pass such  legislation.</p>
<p>I agree with one thing Mr. Kelly has said recently: We need to  continue the discussion about the energy future we want for Missouri. But ramming a piece of pro-nuclear legislation through the legislature  at this time is a very poor way to maintain a discussion that ought to  include the people of Missouri, not just the big money players.    <strong><a title="Ramming Through" href="http://www.columbiamissourian.com/stories/2011/05/03/letter-ramming-through-pro-nuclear-legislation-not-energy-solution-missouri/" target="_blank">READ MORE</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mosafeenergy.org/current/2011/05/ramming-through-pro-nuclear-legislation-not-an-energy-solution-for-missouri/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time Sensitive Legislative Alert</title>
		<link>http://mosafeenergy.org/current/2011/05/time-sensitive-legislative-alert/</link>
		<comments>http://mosafeenergy.org/current/2011/05/time-sensitive-legislative-alert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 06:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues We Oppose]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mosafeenergy.org/current/?p=561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We strongly encourage all MSE members and supporters to contact both your state senator and representative as soon as possible, asking them not to support passage of any bill that repeals the anti-CWIP legislation enacted by Missouri voters by a two-to-one margin. The existing No-CWIP law is an essential consumer protection. Ameren and other utilities [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We strongly encourage all MSE members and supporters to contact both  your state senator and representative as soon as possible, asking them  not to support passage of any bill that repeals the anti-CWIP  legislation enacted by Missouri voters by a two-to-one margin.</p>
<p>The  existing No-CWIP law is an essential consumer protection. Ameren and  other utilities should not be able to transfer financial risk to their  ratepayers, or begin charging them for a plant now that won’t be in  operation for another decade, if ever.</p>
<div id="attachment_564" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://mosafeenergy.org/current/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/callaway-1-and-2.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-564" title="Callaway 1 with an artist's rendition of Callaway 2." src="http://mosafeenergy.org/current/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/callaway-1-and-2-300x164.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="164" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Callaway 1 with an artist&#39;s rendition of Callaway 2.</p></div>
<p><strong>PLEASE TAKE  ACTION NOW:</strong> Here are the web addresses where you can find  phone numbers and email address for your legislators:</p>
<p><a onmousedown="UntrustedLink.bootstrap($(this), &quot;bd471&quot;, event,  bagof({}));" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.house.mo.gov/member.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.house.mo.gov/member.aspx</a></p>
<p><a onmousedown="UntrustedLink.bootstrap($(this), &quot;bd471&quot;, event,  bagof({}));" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.senate.mo.gov/11info/senalpha.htm" target="_blank">http://www.senate.mo.gov/11info/senalpha.htm</a></p>
<p>If  you are not certain the name of your state rep or state senator, you  can go to <a onmousedown="UntrustedLink.bootstrap($(this), &quot;bd471&quot;, event,  bagof({}));" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.senate.mo.gov/" target="_blank">http://www.senate.mo.gov/</a> and plug your zip code into the legislator lookup box. If you don’t  know your full nine-digit zip code, you can get this at <a onmousedown="UntrustedLink.bootstrap($(this), &quot;bd471&quot;, event,  bagof({}));" rel="nofollow" href="http://zip4.usps.com/zip4/welcome.jsp" target="_blank">http://zip4.usps.com/zip4/welcome.jsp</a></p>
<p><strong>WHERE  WE STAND TODAY: </strong> Although one CWIP repeal bill was thrown out  in the Senate recently, there remain others hovering in both chambers  that could still be rammed through or attached to other legislation at  the last minute.  Our legislators need to know this is totally  unacceptable. Currently, the bills we’re concerned with are House Bill  124 and either Senate Bill 321 or Senate Bill 406. Please reference  these when calling, but be sure to indicate that any bill that allows  any CWIP funding is unacceptable.</p>
<p>Some suggested points  you can make are:</p>
<p>*  Ameren Vice-President Steve Kidwell  has stated publicly that if Ameren would pursue the kind of efficiency  improvements they know are possible, then they wouldn&#8217;t need any new  plants for 20 years, plus they could close down the coal-fired Meramec  plant.</p>
<p>*  Fukushima is an on-going catastrophe of so-far  unknown dimensions.  This is no time to be forging ahead with plans to  build more reactors when we need to be assessing the safety of those  that already exist, and coming up with sensible plans to  store the  thousands of tons of existing nuclear waste sitting in cooling pools.</p>
<p>*   Nuclear energy is dirty, costly and dangerous, and I prefer investing  in a clean energy future using a broad range of clean, renewable sources  as well as investing in maximum efficiency.</p>
<p>*  I don&#8217;t  support a kind of energy future that puts all of the risk on ratepayers  and taxpayers, while giving all the profits to Ameren.</p>
<p>Be  polite and, if you would, report the replies you get back to MSE.</p>
<p><strong>PLEASE  CALL TODAY OR TOMORROW, IF AT ALL POSSIBLE! </strong></p>
<p><strong>For more info please  <a title="Help Stop" href="http://mosafeenergy.org/current/2011/03/help-stop-sb-50-now-321-hb-124/">CLICK HERE</a><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mosafeenergy.org/current/2011/05/time-sensitive-legislative-alert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

